.
Feedback

Django Unchained: Tarantino Challenges Viewers

Django Unchained a great, but ultra-violent genre buster.

"Django Unchained" is playing in Herndon. See showtimes here.

If at this point in the season, dear reader, you are still hankering for Hallmark holiday rom-coms or your umpteenth viewing of "Rudy", let me suggest you give this review nothing more than a scan and toss away any thoughts of seeing Quentin Tarantino's latest.

If however, you passed the worst dysfunctional family holiday in recent memory, "Django Unchained," the spectacularly politically incorrect and beautifully acted mash-up of revenge fantasy and spaghetti Western may be the perfect antidote.  If you are a fan of the director's work, able to quote the lawn storage line from Pulp Fiction, run—don't walk—to your nearest theatre. You'll be talking about this movie for months to come.

I can't see why anyone is remotely surprised at Tarantino pushing the edges of propriety in his attempts to create a valuable addition to his directorial oeuvre. It wouldn't fit in with “Inglorious Basterds,” “Kill Bill” and “Pulp Fiction” any other way.  Quentin wouldn't be Quentin if he gave a rat's patootie about offending anyone. Those of us who appreciate his work are generally glad he has little to no inner censor. In this story of Django, a slave-turned-bounty hunter tracking down a brutal plantation owner to rescue his wife Broomhilda, he threw down the gauntlet to even his biggest fans.

There is such liberal use of the n-word, a meter should be keeping track at the bottom corner of the screen. While they're at it, they should add a bullet count with a special sidebar for bullets shot into dead bodies. Perhaps also a side meter that gauges the height of blood sprays? You get the picture.

The movie starts so modestly. There is a bit of carnage, sure, but nothing like what we're used to. The audience is lulled into a state of contentment as we enjoy every pithy pointed line delivered by dentist turned bounty hunter Christoph Waltz in his clipped accent. His timing is beyond compare.

Waltz has a way of being flamboyant and staid at the same time that makes him mesmerizing to watch. He is so good, there is barely room for others onscreen. Watch Jamie Foxx, who does a perfectly fine job as the title character, trying to keep up.

The movie really takes off into the wacky world of Tarantino when Django and Dr. Schultz (Waltz) track Broomhilda to Candyland, the notorious plantation owned by puffed up, pretentious, and terrifying Calvin Candie. As Candie, Leonardo DiCaprio has a scene worth the price of admission, made famous by the fact that he cuts his hand badly during a take and improvises through it, picking glass pieces out and bleeding all over the place, using it to heighten the scene's tension. Were it not for the spoilers of Phillip Seymour Hoffman for The Master and Tommy Lee Jones for Lincoln, Leo might have a clear path for the Oscars. He has already won Best Supporting Actor this year from the National Board of Review.

The third part of the movie is awash in blood and violence. What starts out seeming the least bloody by Tarantino, ends up winning by a mile, or if you prefer, by several exploding heads. There are folks beating each other to death for sport, slow motion revenge killings, protracted shoot outs, all that spray blood and guts across the screen. There are more splayed fingers shooting up in the audience than I see at a Jason Voorhees flick. One scene in particular would challenge even his most jaded fan, wherein a man is torn apart by dogs. Is Tarantino playing one-upsmanship with his own farthest over the top reaches of ultra violence?

Why, you less initiated might ask, would anyone put themselves through watching this kind of movie? Much has been made of how disrespectful the film is being about slavery. I would argue, as, I suspect, would the director, there will not be a time in the foreseeable future when the subject matter will be able to be tackled in any way without causing offense. Tarantino's answer, as it was in “Inglorious Basterds,” is to go so far that the movie will have to cause some dialogue. If it does that at the same time as entertain through his unique talent for screenwriting, he will have done something to effect society, while at the same time paying homage to important yet often overlooked genres in film history.

Those of you who are curious: Go and decide for yourself. Watching “Django Unchained” may be challenging, but to Cinema Siren at least, it's worth it.

[Want to stay on top of news in Herndon? Sign up for our daily or breaking news emails.]

Dave Webster December 29, 2012 at 02:25 pm
I recently listened to an interview on NPR with Quentin Tarantino. He was an exceedingly annoying man who constantly cackled in a high-pitched voice. I don't think I will be seeing "Django Unchained." I would however pay money to see "Quentin Quarantined."
Leslie Combemale December 29, 2012 at 06:53 pm
QT is without question a bit hard to take...but I'm given to understand Kubrick, Orson Welles, John Ford, and Cecil B. DeMille were no picnic either. Quirk is expected with the best or most innovative directors. You may hate his physical voice, but his artistic voice is unique enough to garner many top movie honors for Django Unchained this year...
Don Joy December 29, 2012 at 09:31 pm
Meanwhile, an integration update video from reality, not Hollywood:
http://vidaru.com/black-mobs-attacks-white-pedestrians-media-silent/30680223#.UN9Y7tBuI30.facebook
James December 30, 2012 at 03:07 am
Leslie, was this better than Inglourious Basterds? Personally, I thought Tarantino was awesome in From Dusk Till Dawn and a small part in a few Alias episodes.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Herndon Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jennifer van der Kleut (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 11:07 pm
Hi Craig - can you send me an email? I'll help get this figured out. Thanks!Read More jennifer.vanderkleut@patch.com
Jennifer van der Kleut (Editor) June 18, 2013 at 08:01 am
Awww, Dave! Anything specific? Believe me, no one's more rattled than me....but I think given timeRead More we'll all get used to it, as we do with anything. But if you're having trouble finding or figuring out how to use anything, please let me know!
Dave Webster June 18, 2013 at 02:51 pm
I preferred having the local voices scroll where you could see comments on the articles. I hadRead More some problem uploading my picture to my profile.
Bob Bruhns May 26, 2013 at 10:16 am
The problem is that we got tricked into overpriced and premature rail, when we should have startedRead More with Bus Rapid Transit. Had we done that, we could long ago have extended an efficient, dedicated-road bus system from Falls Church out further than Ashburn, and about now we might be converting that to rail from Falls Church to Tysons Corner. By avoiding the ridiculous price of the Silver Line Metrorail, we could also have extended a dedicated-road bus system out toward Centreville and Woodbridge by now as well. Take a look at the pricetag for the Silver Line - $6 Billion for one single Metrorail line on the north side of Fairfax County and into Loudoun County. We are juggling the books to borrow the needed money for that, and County taxes and the Dulles Toll Road tolls will be repaying the gargantuan borrowing until at least 2048 (that's 35 years from now). Existing roads, bridges and rail, need varying degrees of maintenance and expansion. We now have the NVTA and a transportation tax authorization (that we voted down in 2002, by the way), but don't expect our Metrorail line to be its central focus - our rail line is only one little line on the northern edge of our transportation district. NVTA will be looking at the transportation needs of ALL of Prince William, Loudoun, Fairfax and Arlington Counties, as well as the cities of Falls Church, Alexandria, Fairfax, Manassas, and Manassas Park. We need financially viable options - not overpriced, premature rail.
Mark Carolla May 27, 2013 at 02:12 pm
Hi Bob - "By avoiding the ridiculous price of the Silver Line Metrorail, we could also haveRead More extended a dedicated-road bus system out toward Centreville and Woodbridge." I won't address price because the finances of the Silver Line are another story...but actually, Bob, we already have or had Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) [See ---http://greatergreaterwashington.org/post/9600/brt-creep-makes-bus-rapid-transit-inferior-to-rail/] I used it for years commuting to the Pentagon: Metro and Connector Express Buses. There are pseudo light rail like stations at Herndon/Monroe St and there are supposedly bus lanes on the Toll Road. You saw how well that worked in getting people to get out of their cars. With population growth it didn't and it resulted in more paving. The bus lanes became HOV. You are correct that the Silver Line is but one line - and it will need bus connections - frequent and extensive connections - not just during rush hour -along with big parking lots. BRT is an attempt to replicate rail on the cheap - penny wise and pound foolish. Granted I have my prejudices: when I was trained as an Army Transportation Officer we were taught and observed through the years that flanged wheels on steel rails is the most efficient and economical way of moving large numbers of people and materiel. We have been neglecting multi-modal: rail, light rail, and bus for so long in favor of highway interests that we are now in a mess with a reputation as the nation's gridlock capital.
Bob Bruhns May 27, 2013 at 03:36 pm
So, Mark - you are advocating premature rail instead of Bus Rapid Transit, not because BRT is a badRead More solution, but because our governments don't do Bus Rapid Transit correctly. The huge financing problems that result are therefore not the price of transportation, they are the price of bad government. But it seems to me that if you can sell the concept of premature and massively expensive rail to our government leaders, you can sell the concept of properly-designed Bus Rapid Transit to them as well. I don't think that throwing big money at transportation is the solution. Consider the million-dollar bus 'super-stops' in Arlington County. For the budgeted $948,000 per stop, those should have been really nice bus stops - but they were a ridiculous and total disaster. WMATA and Arlington got together and came up with that nonsense, and now they have been investigating themselves about that for more than a month - with no results whatsoever. Clearly they just want to bury the story, and make us forget all about it. And consider the big transit center in Silver Spring, where the government and the contractors didn't take it seriously. Like WMATA and Arlington government, they saw transit construction as a big welfare delivery system just for them. I think that we should address the real problem - bad government - instead of overpaying for premature rail.